The Screwtape Letters and Subjective Relativism

The Screwtape letters was written by C. S. Lewis in 1942. In this book, C. S. Lewis used 31 letters from a senior devil, Screwtape, to his nephew to describe how to louse up a persons soul. The most important idea is that when write d live with the standard of self-regulation step by step with infixed relativism, the self-regulation pass on be too low without any aw beness, which means the victim does non each the alike know his spirit was corrupted and he always mobilise what he did is amend. The key point is that subjective relativism, view that an action is morally righteousness if a person approves of it, would be dangerous.When comparing this theory with the worry surround in lock do, the short letters atomic number 18 surprisingly similar. If a manager controls a queen-size company or organization with subjective relativism-all depends on the situation with settings-the standard of the company or organization would be lowed step by step and finally out of contr ol. As a result, managers dont like a relativism management environment they always use universalism or even absolutism to manage the systems. unobjective relativism is considered dangerous for a management system, and some other pots money, anonymity, and subjective relativism is a deadly combination.However, subjective relativism is not the center reason that makes the management system fail. Sometimes, it chiffonier improvement the management system. A New Examination of boiling frogs we know where we are The boiling frog is a wide known story which is likewise very similar with the story of Screwtape. When putting a frog in a tush with boiling water supply in it, the frog will jump out of the pot immediately. However, when it was put in a pot of cold water and the pot was slowly heated, the frog would be boil alive and die in the pot.However, this story is proved not dead on target recently. concord to Fast Company (2006), J. Debra Hofman did a mod examination of the boiling frogs. We placed Frog A into a pot of cold water and applied moderate heat. At 4. 20 seconds, it safely exited the pot with a leap of 24 centimeters. We then placed Frog B into a pot of lukewarm water and applied moderate heat. At 1. 57 seconds, it safely exited the pot with a leap of 57 centimeters. Hofman commented, The change apologue assumes a very narrow view of people.If frogs corporation do it, people definitely can. Just like the story of boiling frogs, the system doesnt real out of control with subjective relativism. Relativism lend oneselfs that there are no absolute moral principles, just now the rules that truly guide them in for from each one one situation are to be determined by their relation to something else the willing of customs or culture of the group, or the desires of the workmates. Gibb, J. R. (1991). Subjectivism means that the sole character reference of knowledge or authority is in the perception of the individual. (Lisa normality, 1995) When combining subjectivism and relativism, each person is his/her own authority in the business life, and is the source of his/her own guide. On this reasoning, each person has the right to decide on all matters of what is right and wrong. infixed relativism can only lead people to do as they want, and the rules which guide them is depends on the environment, which means the relationships with others around them are the core reason why they change. For instance, in the story of Screwtape letters, the true way of debauch a persons soul is the so called influence of others, not subjective relativism.Self-awareness cant be lowed, what is changing is relationship with others. According to subjective relativism, whats right for the employees may not be necessarily right for the company. However, the smack of right or wrong is directly linked to the feeling of right or wrong from the group he/she lived in. As a result, when a manager is able to affect the employees by delivering his/her idea and lever to the workplace (a group where employees are in), subjective relativism can bene couple the company. Universalism vs.Relativism atomic business is perfectly fitful for relativism system Another quite contrary judgment system is universalism. Universalism and relativism are always compared in a internal view point. Universalism holds that more than primitive cultures will eventually evolve to look at the same system of law and rights as Western cultures. Cultural relativists hold an opposite, nevertheless similarly rigid viewpoint, that a traditional culture is unchangeable. In universalism, an individual is a social unit, possessing inalienable rights, and driven by the credit line of self-interest.In the cultural relativist model, a community is the basic social unit. Concepts such as individualism, freedom of choice, and equality are absent. It is recognized that the community always comes first. (Clemens N. Nathan, 2009) however, when talking abou t business systems, these concepts are a little bit different. Universalism refers to a system with common rules with similar settings, which means the system has the exactly same rules for all the employees. Looking at the top 100 multinational corporations, they are all using universalism. Universalism is needed today more than ever, especially in multinational corporations. (David C. Wyld, 2011) As the world is becoming a smaller place because of globalization and Internet, universalism makes more sense in dealing with multinational issues. It can help the company to develop not only the standard of work environment, but also the reputation of the corporations. However, when focus on the most rapidly developing type of companies, small businesses, universalism seems too general and unfriendly to the employees. change surface though subjective relativism has great problems and has a potential for annoyance the employees, universalism in its current state is not the ideal solut ion Wole Soyinka (2008). Subjective Relativism can help the employees to be more interested in the work and maximise the innovation of them. Besides, managers are able to control the company since it just fall in relatively small amount of employees that they wont be abused. Subjective Relativism in New Economy The new economy iscommonlybelieved to split from the late 1990s, as computer and Internet was developing worldwide. Companies in the new economy are heavily involved in theinternet and biotech industries, but the ripple effects of new technologies has spread out toall other industries as well(Investopedia,2012) The networked organizations need a different kind of control. Employees are highly empowered. They can get access to as many kit and caboodle and customers as they can. Besides, employees are highly educated today, sometime they stool really good ideas about what companies should do to improve. In this way, managers should be more mensural when controlling the ma nagement system, and common rules with similar settings are not enough.Subjective relativism is more powerful in encouraging employees. The system gives the employees to be able to take away what they think is right to do, and the rules are relatively different but fit for each employee. There is no logical connection between what you have a right to do and the right thing to do but there is a psychological temptation to move from one to the other. Lets register that again In logic, there is no connection between You have the right to think what you like, and Anything you happen to like to think is right. You have the right, after all, to contradict yourself you have all the right in the world to think that 2+2=5. That doesnt make it correct. But psychologically, once you have told me that no one has the right to correct me when I claim certain sorts of opinions you sure seem to have told me that any such opinions are right, or at least as right as opinions can be. As Lisa Newt on (1998) said, with subjective relativism, empowered employees are able to show their opinions and discuss those opinions unneurotic with out shame. Meanwhile, managers can communicate with his group much better and active.However, a big concern is that subjective relativism really has a potential for abuse the employees, so it would be a big challenge for managers to use this method. unitary suggestion is to combine the subjective relativism with universalism. That is, using the universalism in the company or corporation, but authorizes some division managers to use subjective relativism among the most fine groups. In this way, companies can not only gain the benefit from universalism system, but also maximize the efficiency of the most excellent employees. References David C.Wyld(2011) Southeastern lanthanum University in Philosophy, March 17, 2011,Rethieved from http//socyberty. com/philosophy/the-top-10-things-you-need-to-know-about-ethical-universalism-an-analysis-of-how-w hat-is-right-and-wrong-transcends-most-cultures-societies-and-religions/ixzz2BNEPJbOP Fast Company (2006) Next Time, What swear We Boil a Consultant. Fast Company Issue 01. October 1995. Retrieved from http//www. fastcompany. com/26455/next-time-what-say-we-boil-consultant Gibb, J. R. (1991) commit A New Vision of Human, Relationships for Business, Family and Personal Living. North Hollywood, CA Newcastle publishing Company. 991. Investopedia (2012) New Economy. Buzz Word-economy. Retrieved from http//www. investopedia. com/terms/n/neweconomy. aspixzz2BMsc3J3c Lisa Newton (1998a) Subjective Relativism as a Challenge to Ethics. Doing Good and Avoiding Evil Part I. Principles and conclude Lisa Newton (1998b) Moral Commitments and the Discipline of Ethics. Doing Good and Avoiding Evil Part I. Principles and reason Neumann Nathan (2009) the Changing Face of Religion and Human Rights by Clemens Wole Soyinka(2008) The avertible TRAP of CULTURAL RELATIVISM, on the occasion of the seco nd edition of the geneva