White Attitudes Towards Nature Essay -- Racial Relations, Indian, Whit

In Luther Standing Bears temper and Louis Owenss The American Indian Wilderness, the authors dictate differences in Indian and white relationships with temperament. They stress how Indians enamor record, their balanced relationship with it, and how they know natural state is just a European idea. Though agreeing here, Standing Bear focuses on the Lakota view of how Indians truly lived while Owens reveals two sides and count ons white views can substitution with time.Standing Bear thinks the difference in how whites and Indians hold reputation stems from childhood. He believes Indian children are aware of temperament because they have been taught to become cognizant of life and spend time just observing the wild things somewhat them (9). By seeing the world this way, their love and respect for it flourishes (Standing Bear 10). This insight sharply contrasts to ignorant whites who foolishly play as children, ignoring everything but to each champion other, and grow up di sregarding the knowledge record gives and viewing it solely as something to use. He says whites are bored with nature because they do non have the Indian point of view (11). This distance whites have from nature harms their relationship with nature and humans, making them less compassionate when they do non see that mans heart, away from nature, becomes hard (12).Similarly, Owens says whites see nature differently because of childhood experiences. Instead of growing up in nature daily, white children go on sporadic vacations camping, and thus view nature as a tourist attraction instead of a secondment home. He states Indians embrace nature because it has a stronger family significance to them that whites do non see. Indians call the Cascades the Great Mother because of stories they have hear... ...e two races could not understand each other (Standing Bear 12). On the other hand, Owens has consent for whites because he did not grow up with Indian traditions. He has seen whites preserving nature when he was sent to burn the shed, so even though they do not yet understand it he has hope that they can one day appreciate it.Indians understand and value nature more than whites and these authors sleep together that. They believe the trouble with white attitudes is they do not truly see nature or form a harmonious relationship with it, and whites think they can be separated from their idea of wilderness. Although Standing Bear is precise of whites and believes they will never change, Owens thinks they will if they continue to redefine how they view nature. Overall, both authors want whites to respect the Indian view of nature and aspire to see it that way also.