Thursday, February 14, 2019

Inaccurate View of the Legal System Essay -- Law Jury System

Although often interpreted differently by individuals, intelligent rights, human rights and thejury administration are ingrained features of the levelheaded system. Nielsen believes that the main(prenominal) purpose ofrights is to protect individuals, while Hajjar portrays the objective of the legal system asrecognizing and respecting certain inherent human rights. Further, Dooley understands the jurysystem as essential for ensuring a democratic and fair trial procedure. As rights and the jurysystem are viewed according to these varying objectives, it seems there is a general self-confidencethat the legal system is intended to protect individuals from the power of the government.However, individuals abstract bringing close together of how the law works can be contrary to the actual industrial plantof the legal system. Rights and the jury system create the expectation in muckle that they will beprotected from the power of the government, and yet these expectations often car ry on unfulfilled,creating a disconnect between the idea of protection and the reality of the legal system.In her article The Work of Rights and the Work Rights Do, Laura Beth Nielsen assertsthat legal rights are master(prenominal) for protecting individual autonomy and resisting the arbitrary ortyrannical lying of state power (Nielsen 63). In the case of traditionally disadvantagedgroups, rights prevail provided a sense of power as a direct precede of their nature. Nielsen explains,Rights are said to apply equally to everyone, they are neutral, and are sanction by thelegitimate authority of law and the state, and that Rights are often fantasy of as naturallyinhering in persons (66, 68). Because many minority groups view rights as inalienable,absolute, and supported by the government, they... ...ermining the very ideal that rights seem to stand for. The disagreement between expectationsand individuals lived experiences seems to show that rights and the jury system are fundam entalto our democratic society, but only when the government feels they should be so.Works CitedMLA CitationDooley, Laura Gaston. Our Juries, Our Selves The Power, recognition and Politics of the CivilJury. Before the Law An Introduction to the Legal Process. Ed. rear end J. Bonsignore., et.al. Boston Houghton Mifflin Company, 2006. pp. 450-453.Hajjar, Lisa. Human Rights. reader 55-62.Margulies, Joseph. A Prison Beyond the Law. The Virginia every quarter Review. Reader119-128.Nielsen, Laura Beth. The Work of Rights and the Work Rights Do A Critical Approach.Reader 45-79.Toyosaburo Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S, 214 (1944). Reader 91-102.

No comments:

Post a Comment