Tuesday, February 5, 2019
The meaning of contingence speculation is unrivalled thing depends on opposite things. An effectiveness of a attractor moldiness be well fix between its style and behavior and the terminal figure of the built in bed. A drawing cards style work in one situation might not necessary work in other situation. In contingency theory, leadership style describe as task-oriented or relationship-oriented. A relationship-oriented leader established respect, mutual trust and listen to employees needs. A task-oriented leader is motivated by task accomplishment. Next, task-oriented provide clear directions and set implementation standards. The theory provides effectively matching the leader and situation. The most important elements to contingencies be the situation and followers. In contingency approach its surrounding with leader, followers and situation. The three main factors of contingency approach are leader division relations, position power and task structure. Task, structure, context, and environment are important to leadership style. Fiedlers contingency model, situational theory, path-goal theory and Vroom-Jago contingency model developed the contingency model by Fiedler and his associates. The Fiedlers contingency model was design to name leadership style and situation in organization. The principle of this model is In Fiedlers contingency model styles is task-oriented or relationship-oriented. To measure leader styles, fielders developed the Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) scale. When leaders who score towering on this scale, which are relationship oriented and those who score low on this scale are describe as task oriented. A task-oriented leader builds respect, mutual trust and listens to employees needs. A relationship-ori... ...riented leadership and participative leadership (Ho apply & Mitchell, 1974, p. 83). cut goal theory attempts to combine the motivation principles become a theory of leadership. This makes path-goal theory unique becau se no other leadership approaches deal with this way. The other strength of path goal theory that is leaders clarifies the paths to the goals and helps remove whatsoever difficulties for the subordinates. The disadvantage that is path goal theory has not examined the basic motivational assumptions of the theory. Next, most leadership scholars agree that path-goal theory has not been adequately tried (Thomas, P. D. G. 1971). Path goal does not describe how a leader could use different styles to help subordinates feel assured of success. For example, path-goal theory does not apologize how directive leadership increase subordinate motivation during ambiguous task.